GIF89a;
Direktori : /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/ |
Current File : //var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/60_whitelist.cf |
# SpamAssassin rules file: default whitelists # # Please don't modify this file as your changes will be overwritten with # the next update. Use /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf instead. # See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details. # # <@LICENSE> # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more # contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with # this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. # The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 # (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with # the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at: # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software # distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. # </@LICENSE> ########################################################################### # Whitelist rules # # Note that most of these get 'noautolearn'. They should not be # considered when deciding whether to auto-learn a message, as a # user slip-up could result in scribbling side-effects in the bayes # db as a result -- which is hard to remedy. ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval header USER_IN_BLACKLIST eval:check_from_in_blacklist() describe USER_IN_BLACKLIST From: address is in the user's black-list tflags USER_IN_BLACKLIST userconf noautolearn header USER_IN_WHITELIST eval:check_from_in_whitelist() describe USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list tflags USER_IN_WHITELIST userconf nice noautolearn header USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST eval:check_from_in_default_whitelist() describe USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST From: address is in the default white-list tflags USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST userconf nice noautolearn header USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO eval:check_to_in_blacklist() describe USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO User is listed in 'blacklist_to' tflags USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO userconf noautolearn header USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO eval:check_to_in_whitelist() describe USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO User is listed in 'whitelist_to' tflags USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO userconf nice noautolearn header USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO eval:check_to_in_more_spam() describe USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO User is listed in 'more_spam_to' tflags USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO userconf nice noautolearn header USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO eval:check_to_in_all_spam() describe USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO User is listed in 'all_spam_to' tflags USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO userconf nice noautolearn if (version >= 3.004000) body URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST eval:check_uri_host_in_blacklist() describe URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Host or Domain is listed in the user's URI black-list tflags URI_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST userconf noautolearn body URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST eval:check_uri_host_in_whitelist() describe URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST Host or Domain is listed in the user's URI white-list tflags URI_HOST_IN_WHITELIST userconf nice noautolearn # Bug 7256, using a header rule with an eval() function does not work the way # this was intended. # header HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST eval:check_uri_host_listed('BLACK') # describe HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST Host or Domain in header is listed in the user's URI black-list # tflags HEADER_HOST_IN_BLACKLIST userconf noautolearn # header HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST eval:check_uri_host_listed('WHITE') # describe HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST Host or Domain in header is listed in the user's URI white-list # tflags HEADER_HOST_IN_WHITELIST userconf nice noautolearn endif ########################################################################### # Default whitelists. These should be addresses which send mail that is often # tagged (incorrectly) as spam; it also helps that they be addresses of big # companies with lots of lawyers, so if spammers impersonate them, they'll get # into big trouble, so it doesn't provide a shortcut around SpamAssassin. # # Whitelist and blacklist addresses are now file-glob-style patterns, so # "friend@somewhere.com", "*@isp.com", or "*.domain.net" will all work. # # Please do not add unmoderated public mailing lists here. They are # too easily abused by spammers. def_whitelist_from_rcvd billing@networksolutions.com networksolutions.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd outbound-response@networksolutions.com networksolutions.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd hostmaster@internic.net internic.net def_whitelist_from_rcvd support@register.com register.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd petitions@petitiononline.com petitiononline.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@online.telstra.com.au telstra.com.au def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@yahoo-inc.com yahoo-inc.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@yahoo-inc.com yahoo.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@orbitz.com orbitz.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM lsoft.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd freshmeat-news-admin@lists.freshmeat.net freshmeat.net def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@mailer.whitehat.com whitehat.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@spamex.com spamex.com def_whitelist_from_rcvd *enotify@usenix.org voyager.usenix.org # internet.com lists def_whitelist_from_rcvd listsupport@internet.com lyris.net # FT.com newsletters def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@newsbyemail.ft.com lodo.exactis.com # Friends re-united (popular UK old-school-network) def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@friendsreunited.co.uk friendsreunited.co.uk # RFC Editor mails def_whitelist_from_rcvd rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org isi.edu def_whitelist_from_rcvd *@*.nsi-direct.com e-dialog.com endif